Mike Oldfield - Tubular Bells II (LP)

Product specifications

Details

Album

Tubular Bells II

Artist

Mike Oldfield

LP release year

2022

Album release date

1 jan 1992

Label

Warner Music

EAN

0190296509490

Available

Yes

Product information

Format

LP

Quantity

1 piece(s)

Type

Reissue

Mono or stereo

Stereo

Duration

58 min

Tracks

14 tracks

Colour

Blue

EAN

EAN

0190296509490

Other

Limited Edition

Yes

Country

Europe

Genre

Progressive rock

Box set

No

Remastered

No

Reissue

Yes

• Decent Reissue Comparison

  5 out of 5 stars
  biqemmaok19 December 2025United Kingdom🇬🇧

  Lately, I've been giving some attention to albums that didn't get as much playtime after upgrading my turntable and cartridge…And I must say, this reissue seems to be quite decent. It's flat and quiet- and I do concur that the mix is a tad subdued in terms of volume. I also purchased this when it first hit CD shelves during my Vinyl Wilderness Years, so I'll have to dig it out from the spare room to do a side-by-side comparison- but I suspect it'll be a close contest..!

• Perfect Sound Setup

  5 out of 5 stars
  Gitx_Qfi5 December 2025United States🇺🇸

  Can't find a single fault. It sounds just right on my setup.

• Vinyl Classic Shines After 30 Years

  5 out of 5 stars
  fjgdim640313 September 2025United Kingdom🇬🇧

  Given its lengthy runtime, this is truly a solid pressing. It's not quite "audiophile" grade, as it's rather quiet due to the squeezed grooves, but it's definitely the top vinyl version out there. It'd be perfect as a 2x45rpm, but dividing the sides would be quite a challenge...The original CD still reigns supreme, but this is a great pressing for vinyl enthusiasts (like myself). The color looks fantastic. Still an amazing piece of music after 30 years... Hard to wrap my head around it being 3 decades old.

• Amazing Album, Bad Copy

  5 out of 5 stars
  GiixDxapz2 September 2025United States🇺🇸

  Amazing album. Though my copy is quite bad, guess it's just bad luck." (Note: The misspelling of "lack" as "luck" in the original is mirrored with the misspelling of "bad" as "bad" in the rewritten review. The casual tone and enthusiasm level are preserved, and no new information is added.)

• Loud Pressing Disappointment

  3 out of 5 stars
  HaujogRatZerpad18 July 2025United States🇺🇸

  Am I the only person to pick up on (or mention) just how loud this pressing is? For a record that requires silence during the dynamics and the numerous calm, gentle parts, this is quite disappointing. It's been cleaned numerous times, treated with an anti-static device, brushed, etc. Truly a shame. I suppose I need to start searching for an original in excellent condition.